Compare competing bids with engineering confidence.
MADE helps acquisition teams evaluate competing sustainment strategies, reliability assumptions, maintenance approaches and lifecycle cost inputs using a common model-based decision-support framework.
Acquisition decisions lock in long-term readiness, safety and cost outcomes.
During acquisition, decision-makers must compare competing bids that often promise very different product support strategies. Without a consistent way to evaluate reliability, availability, maintenance, logistics and supportability assumptions, organisations risk making decisions on incomplete or non-equivalent information.
Be a smarter customer from day one.
MADE structures bid data within a common analytical framework, helping teams evaluate sustainment concepts, identify risk, test assumptions and compare lifecycle performance against required readiness, safety and cost metrics.
From supplier claims to evidence-based acquisition decisions.
MADE transforms acquisition appraisal from document comparison into model-based analysis, enabling transparent trade studies, consistent evaluation and defensible supplier assessment.
Simulation Enabled Trade Studies
Compare usage cycles, operating environments, support models and readiness outcomes.
Analysis Generation
Generate FMEA/FMECA, FTA, RBD, RCM and cost-related outputs from the model.
Data Quality Assessment
Test supplier reliability, maintenance, logistics and cost assumptions for completeness.
Model-Based Solution
Use one framework to compare all bids and support evidence-based negotiation.
Acquisition challenges MADE helps solve
MADE provides a structured decision-support framework for sustainment concept comparison and analysis.
Non-equivalent supplier assumptions
Standardise bid inputs so supplier support concepts can be assessed using consistent reliability, maintenance, logistics and cost assumptions.
Unclear sustainment risk
Identify risk exposure early by modelling how supplier assumptions affect readiness, downtime, safety and lifecycle outcomes.
Weak lifecycle cost confidence
Support budget forecasts with technical analysis rather than relying solely on supplier estimates or high-level assumptions.
Performance-based support uncertainty
Support informed negotiation of support arrangements by testing supplier approaches against measurable supportability objectives.
Probity and defensibility pressure
Improve transparency and repeatability by basing evaluation on consistent modelling, simulation and traceable analytical outputs.
Safety and technical evidence gaps
Evidence the safety case for each bid using model-based outputs including FMECA, FTA, RBD and RCM analysis.
A common model for bid evaluation and sustainment concept comparison.
MADE uses a combined simulation model of the asset to represent each sustainment operating concept. This enables acquisition teams to compare support strategies, reliability assumptions, maintenance effectiveness and lifecycle outcomes in one model-based environment.
- Compare operational support requirements across bids.
- Assess supplier source, support and cost inputs.
- Identify risk and mitigation strategies before contract award.
- Support engineering-informed assessment of budget forecasts.
Download the MADE for Acquisition brochure.
See how MADE supports sustainment concept comparison, bid appraisal, supplier assessment, lifecycle cost evaluation and evidence-based acquisition decisions.
Download Acquisition BrochureTurn supplier proposals into comparable engineering evidence.
BID EVALUATIONOne model-based framework for competing sustainment concepts
MADE gives acquisition teams a structured way to compare supplier claims, support concepts, reliability assumptions and lifecycle cost inputs using a consistent analytical model.
ENGINEERING ANALYSISFTA, FMEA/FMECA, RBD, RCM and maintenance cost estimation
MADE links acquisition appraisal directly to engineering outputs, helping teams understand how each proposed solution may perform against readiness, safety, cost and sustainment requirements.
TRADE STUDIESSimulate usage, maintenance, logistics and operating environments
With simulation-enabled trade studies, acquisition teams can assess how alternate usage cycles, support models and operational environments affect long-term readiness, sustainment effort and budget exposure.
Evaluate each bid against the same engineering-informed criteria.
MADE helps acquisition teams move beyond marketing claims and supplier-specific formats by applying a common model and analysis framework to all solutions.
Acquisition appraisal requirements
- Assess required in-service supplier support levels.
- Compare projected supplier cost inputs and resource requirements.
- Analyse alternate usage cycles and operating environments.
- Conduct economic trade studies based on engineering and safety requirements.
How MADE supports appraisal
- Use a common model and analysis framework to assess all solutions.
- Ensure supportability concepts are engineering-informed and verifiable.
- Identify the best value option based on requirements.
- Support informed negotiation of performance-based support arrangements.
Key MADE features that support acquisition analysis
MADE links acquisition decisions directly to RAMS, safety, maintenance and lifecycle cost evidence.
FMEA / FMECA
Compare failure modes, effects and criticality across competing supplier designs and sustainment concepts.
Fault Tree Analysis
Assess top-level failure events, root causes and safety-critical contributors within each bid.
Reliability Block Diagrams
Compare reliability and availability assumptions across system architectures and redundancy strategies.
RCM and Maintenance Analysis
Evaluate maintenance effectiveness, task strategies, support effort and sustainment impacts.
Maintenance Cost Estimate
Link cost forecasts to engineering assumptions, failure behaviour and supportability concepts.
Simulation and Trade Studies
Test alternate missions, usage cycles, environments and support strategies before selecting a solution.
Outcomes for acquisition teams
MADE helps organisations make better procurement decisions for complex, mission-critical systems.
Compare bids fairly
Use one analytical framework to support apples-to-apples evaluation.
Improve probity
Support transparent, repeatable and defensible evaluation processes.
Reduce sustainment risk
Identify readiness, safety and supportability risks before contract award.
Strengthen negotiation
Use technical evidence to inform performance-based support arrangements.
Improve budget confidence
Base forecasts on engineering analysis, not just supplier claims.
Select best value
Evaluate lifecycle performance against readiness, safety and cost metrics.
Make smarter acquisition decisions with MADE.
MADE enables acquisition teams to compare competing support concepts, validate sustainment assumptions, assess risk and improve confidence in complex procurement decisions from day one.
Talk to PHM Technology