MADE | Defence Case Study

Combat Reconnaissance Vehicle Bid Cost Optimization |

Using MADE to model mission-driven maintenance demand, validate sustainment strategy, and build a defensible affordability case for a Combat Reconnaissance Vehicle proposal.

Digital Risk Twin
Validated Sustainment Approach
Maintenance Cost
Visibility
Affordability
Risk
Reusable Failure &
Maintenance Knowledge
1
Mission-Aware Digital Risk
Twin
The Challenge

Building a Defensible Cost and Sustainment Case for a CRV Bid

The OEM was preparing a bid for the production and sustainment of a Combat Reconnaissance Vehicle at an agreed level of operational capability and availability. To win, the proposal needed more than cost estimates. It needed a credible, technically defensible explanation of how the platform could be sustained affordably across its expected mission profile and operating environments.

The challenge was that maintenance demand was not fixed. It would change depending on how the vehicle was used, where it was operated, and how the sustainment strategy was configured. The OEM needed to understand how mission profile, operating environment, reliability assumptions, and maintenance policy would combine to influence life cycle cost and readiness outcomes.

Just as importantly, the OEM needed to validate that recommended maintenance actions were sound and communicate that analysis clearly to the customer. That required a model-based approach capable of linking design assumptions, failure behaviour, maintenance actions, affordability, and readiness in one consistent analytical framework.

Mission-Driven Cost Uncertainty
Maintenance cost depended on how the CRV would actually be used and the environments it would face. The OEM needed to model those variables accurately to avoid underestimating sustainment demand or overstating affordability.
Readiness vs Affordability Trade-Offs
The OEM needed to compare alternative maintenance approaches and determine which strategy would deliver the required readiness outcome at the lowest practical life cycle cost.
Need for Customer Validation
The recommended sustainment strategy needed to be backed by analysis the customer could trust. The OEM required clear evidence linking reliability assumptions, maintenance actions, and cost outcomes to operational availability.
The Approach

Model-Based Maintenance and Cost Analysis Using MADE

Model the CRV Platform and Operating Context

The OEM generated a MADE model of the Combat Reconnaissance Vehicle and defined the expected mission profiles and operating environments. This established the analytical basis for assessing how operational usage would influence system performance, maintenance demand, and life cycle cost.

01
Calculate Reliability and Identify Maintenance Demand

Using MADE, the OEM calculated the expected reliability of the vehicle systems and identified maintenance requirements for the proposed design configuration. This allowed the team to pinpoint likely poor performers and understand which components would drive sustainment effort and cost.

02
Conduct Trade Studies Across Readiness and Affordability

The OEM used MADE to compare alternative maintenance strategies and assess the impact of configuration choices, mission profile, and operating environment on maintenance costs. These trade studies made it possible to optimise both operational readiness and platform affordability.

03
Validate the Sustainment Strategy and Build Reusable Knowledge

MADE was used to validate the recommended maintenance approach, calculate expected platform maintenance costs, and maintain a knowledge base of failures and associated maintenance actions. That knowledge can be reused across the life of the platform and the full contract period.

04

“MADE enabled the OEM to connect mission profile, reliability, maintenance strategy, and life cycle cost in one defensible model for a high-stakes CRV proposal.”

Outcomes

Stronger Bid Confidence. Clearer Cost Visibility. A Validated Sustainment Strategy.

Mission-Based Cost Insight

The OEM gained a practical way to model how mission profile and operating environment would shape maintenance demand and life cycle cost.

Reduced Sustainment Risk

Potential poor performers were identified early, allowing the OEM to propose maintenance actions aligned to expected system reliability.

Reusable Sustainment Knowledge Base

Failures and associated maintenance actions were captured in a knowledge base that can continue to support the platform throughout the contract life.

Challenges Overcome
Model the impact of mission profile and operating environment on maintenance costs
Identify poor-performing components based on assumed system reliability
Validate a maintenance approach the customer could trust
Keys to Success
Generate a MADE model of the CRV platform and define mission profiles and operating environments
Calculate expected reliability and maintenance requirements for the design configuration
Use trade studies to optimise readiness and affordability while calculating expected maintenance costs
Outputs
MADE delivered the analytical outputs needed to justify the OEM’s bid, validate the sustainment approach, estimate expected maintenance costs, and create a reusable failure and maintenance knowledge base for long-term platform support.
MADE - Outputs

Digital Risk Twin Analysis Outputs

Charting The Failures
Graphically represents failure contributors.
Reliability Analysis
Sets a reliability for the system to analyse MTTF.
Reliability Block Diagrams
Reliability Block Diagrams of the systems (to identify PP components).
FMEA / FMECA
FMEA report for the systems (automatically) generated from the MADE model).
Maintenance Cost Estimate
Provides sustainment parameters to conduct sustainment analysis.

See What MADE Can Do for Your Defence Sustainment and Life Cycle Cost Program

Talk to a PHM Technology specialist and discover how MADE can help you validate sustainment strategy, quantify affordability, and strengthen customer confidence in your next bid or proposal.

Start Your MADE Software Journey Today

Let’s explore how the MADE Reliability Software can transform your engineering processes

Whether you have a specific challenge in mind or just want to learn more, we’re here to help. Fill out the form below and one of our experts will get back to you shortly with insights tailored to your needs.