MADE | Nuclear Case Study

Replacing Time-Based Maintenance with Predictive Analytics in Nuclear Operations |

Helping a US-based nuclear facility reduce unnecessary inspections, optimize sensor placement, and move to a smarter predictive maintenance strategy using MADE.

$4.2M
Estimated Nuclear O&M Savings
$4.2M
Estimated Lifecycle
O&M Savings
Reduced Unnecessary
Inspections
Improved Capacity Factor
Potential
1
Predictive Maintenance
Strategy
The Challenge

Cutting Nuclear O&M Costs Without Compromising Safety or Reliability

A US-based nuclear utility was facing high operations and maintenance costs driven by frequent visual inspections and time-based preventive maintenance. Parts were often being replaced well before failure, increasing labour demand, driving up parts consumption, and reducing available operating capacity.

While this conservative approach supported compliance and safety, it also created avoidable cost and efficiency penalties. The utility wanted to shift to a more intelligent maintenance strategy that could identify emerging failures earlier, reduce unnecessary intervention, and maintain the reliability and safety standards the sector demands.

The challenge was not simply to add more monitoring. It was to determine the right sensor strategy, pair it with the right analytics, and create a real-time diagnostic approach that would support faster, better-informed maintenance decisions.

High Inspection Burden
Frequent visual inspections and scheduled maintenance consumed time and resources, even when equipment condition did not justify intervention.
Premature Part Replacement
Wearable components were being replaced before failure, increasing parts and labour costs without delivering proportional operational value.
Need for Real-Time Fault Insight
The utility needed earlier warning of incipient failures so maintenance teams could act only when assets genuinely required attention.
The Approach

Model-Based Predictive Maintenance Design Using MADE

Conduct a Comprehensive FMEA

Integral Analytics used MADE to carry out a detailed FMEA, identifying the most common degradation mechanisms associated with each critical failure mode. This created a structured foundation for smarter maintenance decision-making.

01
Optimise Sensor Placement and Analytics

Sensors and analytic methods were matched to the failure mechanisms that mattered most, with the goal of minimising the time between the onset of incipient failure and reliable detection.

02
Build an Automated Real-Time Diagnostic Model

The FMEA was translated into an automated diagnostic model that could alert analysts or subject matter experts when failure conditions were detected in real time.

03
Set Thresholds and Response Protocols

Alert thresholds and communication protocols were established based on failure severity, enabling the utility to move from fixed maintenance schedules to a more targeted, predictive maintenance strategy.

04

“MADE enabled a shift from time-based maintenance to predictive action connecting failure behaviour, sensor strategy, and operational savings in one defensible model.”

Outcomes

Measurable Results. Lower Cost. Smarter Maintenance.

$4.2M

Estimated O&M Cost Reduction

The elimination of unnecessary inspections and wearable replacement parts produced an estimated $4.2 MM in savings over the life of the plant.

Improved Resource Allocation

Maintenance teams could focus on the assets that genuinely required attention, improving efficiency and reducing unnecessary effort.

Predictive Maintenance Foundation

The utility gained a real-time diagnostic framework to support condition monitoring, earlier fault insight, and a more sustainable maintenance strategy.

Challenges Overcome
Reduce the burden of frequent visual inspections and time-based maintenance activities
Avoid replacing wearable parts well before failure without sacrificing safety or reliability
Introduce earlier fault detection using optimised sensors and analytics models
Keys to Success
Use MADE to generate a comprehensive FMEA focused on the most common degradation mechanisms
Match sensors and analytics to provide the shortest possible time from incipient failure to detection
Translate engineering analysis into real-time diagnostics, alerts, thresholds, and response protocols
Outputs
MADE delivered the analytical outputs needed to identify critical failure modes, optimise sensor placement, generate diagnostic rules, automate fault logic, and support a predictive maintenance strategy for nuclear operations.
MADE - Outputs

Digital Risk Twin Analysis Outputs

FMEA / FMECA
Automatically generated from the MADE model to identify critical failure modes.
PHM Coverage
Generation of sensor sets to establish how best to optimise sensor placement for monitoring failures in the system.
Diagnostic Rules
Identifies failures based on sensor response and forms the foundation for a causation-based approach to FDI.
Fault Tree Analysis
A top-down method for identifying how component or subsystem failures cause critical events, generated automatically from the system model.
Sensor Set Comparison
Allows users to compare sensor set parameters including coverage, size, weight, and cost.

See What MADE Can Do for Your Predictive Maintenance Strategy

Talk to a PHM Technology RAMS specialist and discover how MADE can help you optimise maintenance strategy, improve fault visibility, and reduce lifecycle cost in complex, high-consequence environments.

Start Your MADE Software Journey Today

Let’s explore how the MADE Reliability Software can transform your engineering processes

Whether you have a specific challenge in mind or just want to learn more, we’re here to help. Fill out the form below and one of our experts will get back to you shortly with insights tailored to your needs.